Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 9(3):135-136.
doi: 10.34172/ajcmi.2022.3406
Letter to Editor
The Microbiome and the Future of Anesthesia
Colton M Zeitler 1
, Thomas Chandy Varkey 2, 3, *
, Zachary I Merhavy 2, 4 
Author information:
1Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine at Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona
2College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
3The Colangelo College of Business, Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, Arizona
4Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados
Copyright and License Information
© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
Please cite this article as follows: Zeitler CM, Varkey TC, Merhavy ZI. The microbiome and the future of anesthesia. Avicenna J Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022; 9(3):135-136. doi:10.34172/ajcmi.2022.3406
Dear editor,
One of the many developing interests in the medical field is the utilization of the human microbiome, which is a complex system of thousands of microorganisms within various body systems, whose population is unique to the individual. Much of this hype is secondary to the work performed under the aptly named Human Microbiome Project (1). The human microbiome grants an individual, unique qualities ranging from specific inflammatory markers to the development of neurological processes. These qualities are adaptable and respond to numerous types of external and internal stimuli. Examples of these changes can be witnessed when the host is exposed to chronic pain stimuli - neurological, visceral, or otherwise. It has been documented that pain signals alter microbiome metabolites, and the subsequent treatment of that pain further induces changes within the microbiome. It is suggested, then, that the gut microbiome is a dynamic population that is constantly changing within a person, and thus “anybody’s” microbiome can be entirely different from the next.
The field of anesthesiology may be next to utilize the human microbiome. A recent paper published by Minerbi and Shen (2) has focused its efforts on reviewing the advancements made thus far. The review showed a comprehensive summary of findings, which revealed that the introduction of anesthetic drugs into a host greatly altered gut microbiome populations, metabolites, and the subsequent communication of the “gut-brain axis”. This axis is a two-way communication pathway between the gut microbiome and the central nervous system via metabolically active metabolites. This relationship has been documented with the investigations of postoperative cognitive dysfunction, an ongoing phenomenon of cognitive decline post-anesthesia, which has represented that the gut microbiome decreases the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and can modulate the occurrence of neuroinflammation (3-5). Nevertheless, research on these exact pathways and their influence on the host is in its infancy.
This opens a promising avenue of research; by cataloging the observed changes in the microbiome when a host is exposed to a specific anesthetic drug, researchers can propose a causal relationship between the microbiome population and activity shifts with the introduction of a particular anesthetic drug. This approach to precision medicine can easily transition from bench to bedside, utilizing microgeonomics with special attention to the cell-free DNA as shown by teams in China (6) and with newer technologies similar in nature to the Karius, currently used in diagnostics (7,8), and other methods such as the one reported by Whittle et al (9) to identify the populations that inhabit one’s microbiome by utilizing advanced algorithms and soft AI. This approach to personalized anesthesia can solve three prevalent phenomena within the field, including unpredictable anesthetic emergencies and side effects, the ability of the trained anesthesiologist to select the best possible cocktail of anesthetic drugs to avoid postoperative sequelae, and the possibility of allowing a better understanding and utilization of drugs employed in pain management and the origin of complex pain symptoms in the first place (3-5).
It is the authorial team’s highest recommendation that patients undergoing a surgical intervention have small fecal samples taken, processed with cell-free DNA testing, and their outcomes with different catalogued drugs. While minorly intensive in the short-term, such testing may prove to be strongly beneficial in providing personalized medical therapy with special attention drawn to ensure the benefit to the patient first and foremost, avoiding potential pitfalls which are now simply unavoidable. With a deeper understanding of these relationships, both microbiology and anesthesiology fields have the potential to make leaps and bounds in advancements to further keep patients safe.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
References
- NIH (2022). NIH Human Microbiome Project. NIH Website. https://www.hmpdacc.org/overview/.
- Minerbi A, Shen S. Gut microbiome in anesthesiology and pain medicine. Anesthesiology 2022; 137(1):93-108. doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004204 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Lian X, Zhu Q, Sun L, Cheng Y. Effect of anesthesia/surgery on gut microbiota and fecal metabolites and their relationship with cognitive dysfunction. Front Syst Neurosci 2021; 15:655695. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.655695 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Liu L, Shang L, Jin D, Wu X, Long B. General anesthesia bullies the gut: a toxic relationship with dysbiosis and cognitive dysfunction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2022; 239(3):709-28. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06096-7 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Wen J, Ding Y, Wang L, Xiao Y. Gut microbiome improves postoperative cognitive function by decreasing permeability of the blood-brain barrier in aged mice. Brain Res Bull 2020; 164:249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.08.017 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Guo W, Shen H, Guo J, Wen D, Yu Y. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing technology for the diagnosis of sepsis in the ICU. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:659390. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.659390 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Peaper DR, Durant TS. Can circulating cell-free microbial DNA carry us into the future of culture independent microbiology?. Clin Chem 2020; 66(1):29-32. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.304220 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Khanna P, Malluru N, Pyada R, Gupta M, Akkihal K, Varkey TC. Fever of unknown origin: the workup and diagnosis of Pel-Ebstein fever. Cureus 2022; 14(2):e21959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21959 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
- Whittle E, Leonard MO, Harrison R, Gant TW, Tonge DP. Multi-method characterization of the human circulating microbiome. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:3266. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03266 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]